All Articles
Workplace Culture

BREAKING: Naperville Man's 'Hey Guys' Email Triggers Institutional Crisis Now Entering Its Third Week

By Woke Watch Daily Workplace Culture
BREAKING: Naperville Man's 'Hey Guys' Email Triggers Institutional Crisis Now Entering Its Third Week

BREAKING: Naperville Man's 'Hey Guys' Email Triggers Institutional Crisis Now Entering Its Third Week

By Staff Reporter, Woke Watch Daily | Workplace Culture

NAPERVILLE, IL — This is a developing story. Woke Watch Daily will continue to update as events warrant.


At 9:14 AM on the second Monday of October, Gregory T. Paulson, 38, a Logistics Coordination Specialist (Level II) at Fenwick & Dray Solutions, a mid-sized supply chain consulting firm headquartered in Naperville, Illinois, sent the following email to the company's 74-person all-staff distribution list:

"Hey guys, just a reminder that the Q3 utilization reports are due to me by end of day Friday. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks, Greg"

Paulson, who has worked at Fenwick & Dray for four years without incident, then walked to the break room, poured himself a cup of coffee, and returned to his desk, where he spent the next 40 minutes reviewing spreadsheets.

By 9:17 AM, the company's internal Slack channel had already registered its first flag.

Hour One: The Flag Is Planted

Sources familiar with the situation, who asked not to be identified because they still work there, confirmed that the initial concern was raised in the #general-announcements channel by an employee in the People & Culture department, who posted: "Quick note — we might want to revisit the language in Greg's email. Just flagging for visibility."

The post received four "eyes" emoji reactions and one thumbs up, which sources describe as "a lot, for 9 AM."

Paulson, asked later whether he had seen the Slack post, confirmed that he had been "heads-down on the utilization thing" and had not.

By 10:30 AM, the flag had been elevated to a "language and inclusion concern" and forwarded to Human Resources Director Tammy Osgood, who was, at that moment, attending a webinar on psychological safety in hybrid work environments. She was pulled out of the webinar.

Paulson refilled his coffee.

Day One, Afternoon: The Communications Audit Is Announced

At 2:15 PM, Paulson received a calendar invite from Tammy Osgood for a meeting titled "Quick Alignment Chat — No Worries, Just a Sync." The meeting was scheduled for the following morning and listed four attendees: Paulson, Osgood, a woman from Legal named Patricia Hsu, and an external consultant whose affiliation was listed only as "Inclusive Communications Partners, LLC."

Paulson accepted the invite and asked a colleague if he knew what it was about.

The colleague said he did not. This was, sources confirm, not entirely accurate.

That same afternoon, Osgood circulated a memo to department heads announcing a voluntary communications audit of recent all-staff correspondence, described as "a proactive opportunity to assess our collective language practices and ensure our written communications reflect our values." The memo did not mention Paulson by name. It did, however, include the phrase "recent correspondence" in a font that sources describe as "somehow heavier than the rest of the document."

Paulson left the office at 5:30 PM and stopped at a Portillo's on the way home. He ordered a beef sandwich. By all accounts, he slept fine.

Day Two: The Alignment Chat

The following morning's meeting lasted one hour and forty minutes.

Paulson, according to sources, spent the first fifteen minutes under the impression that the meeting was about a separate email he had sent in August regarding parking garage access. He was gently corrected.

The Inclusive Communications Partners consultant — a woman named Dr. Felicia Vance, who had driven in from Schaumburg — presented a one-page document titled "Language Landscape Assessment: Preliminary Findings." The document contained, in its entirety, three bullet points and a pie chart. The pie chart was labeled "Gendered Language Incidence Rate" and contained one slice, which was colored red and represented 100% of the data.

Paulson asked whether "guys" was actually a gendered term, noting that he used it with his family and that nobody had ever said anything.

Dr. Vance said that intent and impact were two different things.

Patricia Hsu from Legal wrote something down.

Paulson said he was sorry if anyone had been upset and that he would be happy to use different language going forward.

Dr. Vance said that was a "meaningful first step" and that she looked forward to "continuing the journey together."

Paulson asked if the Q3 utilization reports were still due Friday.

Tammy Osgood said yes.

Week Two: The Style Guide

On the following Monday, all Fenwick & Dray employees received a 47-page document titled "Fenwick & Dray Solutions Inclusive Language Style Guide, Version 1.0 (Draft for Comment)."

The guide, which had been compiled by Dr. Vance's firm at a rate that sources in Accounting describe as "not nothing," covered preferred salutations for group correspondence, a tiered glossary of terms ranked by "inclusivity confidence level," and a two-page flowchart for determining whether a given word required pre-approval from the People & Culture team before use in company-wide communications.

Recommended alternatives to "Hey guys" included: "Hello, team," "Hi, everyone," "Greetings, all," "Good morning, colleagues," and — listed without apparent irony on page 11 — "Salutations, valued contributors."

The guide also contained a foreword by Tammy Osgood, which described the document as "a living resource that will grow alongside us as we continue our shared commitment to communication that sees, includes, and uplifts every voice in our community."

The guide's comment period was set at ten business days. It received 61 comments, of which 58 were from a single employee in IT named Dennis, who had flagged what he described as "a formatting inconsistency on page 34."

Paulson submitted no comments. When asked, he said he had not had a chance to read it yet and asked whether it would be on the Friday agenda.

It would not be on the Friday agenda. The Friday agenda had been replaced by a Town Hall.

Week Three: The Town Hall

The All-Staff Belonging Town Hall, as it was formally titled on the calendar invite, was scheduled for Thursday at 2:00 PM in the main conference room. Attendance was described as "strongly encouraged," which employees across all three floors understood to mean mandatory.

The agenda, circulated 24 hours in advance, listed five items:

  1. Welcome and framing from Tammy Osgood
  2. Presentation from Inclusive Communications Partners, LLC
  3. Small group discussion: "What does inclusive language mean to me?"
  4. Q&A
  5. Commitment cards

Item 5 — commitment cards — were index cards on which employees were asked to write one personal commitment to inclusive communication and post them on a designated wall under the heading "Our Promises to Each Other."

Paulson wrote: "I will use 'Hello, team' in future emails."

He posted it on the wall.

Dr. Vance said it was a "powerful statement."

Paulson thanked her and asked if the utilization reports had come in yet.

Three of the 74 employees had submitted them. The deadline had been the previous Friday.

Where Things Stand Now

As of press time, Fenwick & Dray Solutions has:

Paulson, for his part, sent a follow-up all-staff reminder about the utilization reports on Wednesday afternoon. The email began: "Hello, team."

It received no flags.

It also received no utilization reports.

Paulson has requested a meeting with Tammy Osgood to discuss the deadline situation. The meeting has been scheduled for next Tuesday under the title "Quick Alignment Chat — No Worries, Just a Sync."

He accepted the invite.


This story is developing. Woke Watch Daily will provide updates as the commitment cards are evaluated for tonal sincerity.

Woke Watch Daily: Keeping Score So You Don't Have To™